Week number 5.
So i finally carved out my MP, and counting my stars because i get to do my MP co-currently with SIP. So whatever i do in the lab is pretty revelant. The last time i posted, i didnt really know half of what i was doing. By today, im pretty competent in the area and already progressing in my experiments.
So to clear the foggy picture up, im dealing with an Aurora-A gene that is present in significant levels in cancer patients. More evidently present in breast cancer, Aurora-A is a involved in cellular mitosis and located at the mitotic spindles and is a very imporatnt kinase for proper cell development.
In a nut shell, there is this other gene Aurora-A interacting Protein (AIP), who forms activity with Aurora-A. AIP destabilizes Aurora-A and thus down regulates it. Increase of AIP would destabilze Aurora-A and decrease its levels. Theorically speaking, with that relationship of Aurora-A and AIP established, deleting AIP gene would results to increase in Aurora-A levels. But question is, is that enough to cause tumorigensis?
Most commonly, we deal with transfection. Trnasfection is the introduction of short interferring RNA which acts like a probe specific to the gene. So we had siAIP, which would bind to AIP and "knockdown" the gene, by inhibiting its translation process, physically.
So we had a 4 sample
MOCK - Contains no siRNA.
Mock is almost like another control sample. except that it is mainly for testing the toxicity of the reagent. In this case, the toxicity of lipofectamine, this helps in optimisation of reagent. This also helps in the vaildity of the experiment, that the results are not coincidental.
CONTROL- Contains control siGL2. Binds to luciferase GL2, not targeted to AIP.
The control siGL2 used is almost as a "dummy". The siGL2 is target specfic for a gene that does not exist in mammilian cells. Having a control can vaildate the results by comparing samples and control to deduce a conclusion.
2.5nM- Contains 0.25μl (20μM stock) of siAIP
200nM- Contains 20μl(20μM stock) of siAIP
Both 2.5nM and 200nM have siAIP except in different quantities. This can help to determine if the intensity of the concentration of the siAIP would affect the effectiveness of silencing the gene.
All samples have 5μl of Lipofectamin and 500μl of OptiMem. Solutions are all mixed together and left for 5 mins, to forma complex and later added into the cultures. Cultures are dishes of 60mm and plated 24hours before. This is crucial as is is the optimum timeframe for transfection to work well. Cultures are drained of their old media and washed with PBS before adding 1.5ml of OptiMem.
Cultures are then incubated for 8hours and then the cells are used for different experiments. There are 5 experiments intotal that require the transfected cells.
1. Colony Assay: Cells are plated in low number on 6well dishes and allowed to grow over a period of 2weeks. The wells are later stained and compared in terms of cell size and staining density.
2. Western Blot: Cells are lysed and protein is collected. Standard curve is constructed by bradford assay, and the concentration of the protein is calculated. A loding samples is then formed by ensuring that there is 100μg ofprotein in each load. A dye is added to the protein samples and loaded into the wells of the SDS page and ran on 160v for 1hour. The gel is later transferred onto a membrane by sandwiching it between filter paper and sponge with a cassette holding them together and subjected to electrophoresis, 325mA for 2hours. When the transfer is completed, the membrane is washed 3x with wasbuffer for 10mins each and then probed with 5%milk TBS-secondary Ab soolution for 1hour. Afterwhich is washed again 3x wash buffer 10mins each, and then membrane is taken to react with solutioin west pico 1 and 2 to cleave the substrate off the secondary Ab. Finally the membrane is taken to a dark room and exposed for a desired period of time, and processed with a processor, Kodak X-Omat. The xray flim is then analysed, which if bands form, suggest that the particular protein is present and vice versa.

3. Soft Agar Assay: Cells are embedded in between 2layers of DMEM agar and allowed to grow over 2 weeks. This determines if the respective samples are capable of forming tumors. A positive indication of magliancy can be observed with colonies forming on the agar.
4. Cell Cycle analysis: Cells are just being pass through this FACS analysis machine that can calculate the cell size, cell number, cell granulity, which cell cycle phase the cell is in, etc etc. We are most interested in the cell size and its the stages of the cell cycle that the cell is in.
So far everything has been going pretty well. The xray flims from the western blot of HEK Ras #1 cells showed positive for control and mock while detecting AIP, simply shows that the experiment is least going in the right direction. Very faint bands were formed for AIP which isnt supposed to be the case since the samples were AIP scilenced. this shows that the transfection with siAIP is suscessful, however not enuogh to completely knockdown the AIP gene. Problem might be due to the transfection method, thus more caution should be exercised the next time.
The same membrane was then used to probe for Aurora-A (AIK) protein. With the AIP knocked down, AIK levels should increase, however the bands show equal density as the ones in control and mock. It was then suspected that perhaps the cells are Ras unstable and thus yield lead to the incocnsistancy so then membrane was then probed with Ras-Ab. The results then show that Ras is stable as all 4 samples have the same thick band produced, which indicates Ras stability. We then suspect it might be due to the mechanical issues while performing the experiment, such as incubation time. While the experiment is being repeated, it is necessary to take note of the minute details of the protocol and follow closely to minimize errors.
Even though there were times it got a little tough especially when contamination arises and the cells cannot be used. Hek Ras #3 cells were contaminated after transfection as the cells were incubated for 72hrs before harvesting its proteins. This then wasted 3days of incubation and the western blot could not be derived.
FACs analysis for Hek Ras #3 and Hek Ras#1 is completed however the results are not analysed yet, as FACs analysis fro HEK has not been completed yet.
The soft agar assay and colony assay require 2 weeks of incubation time to produce results, and thus no conclusive results has been produced yet. However the samples are growing well as seen under the microscope.
So far this is about it. It has beena pretty tough few weeks dealing with 3 samples and having to multitask all the 5 experiments or so at one go. Time managment and plannign is very important as samples take a few hours of incubation and sometimes even days. Thus proper planning is required to maximize work effeciency.
GLAD